NEW APPROVAL
Loading......
Loading......
Overall Survival in ES-SCLC
INTERIM ANALYSIS: Half of patients were still alive at 13 months with IMFINZI + EP1,2*
Superior overall survival in first-line ES-SCLC
(median duration of follow-up 14.2 months)1,2


Consistent overall survival at updated analysis
(median duration of follow-up 25.1 months)3†


- OS rate at 18 months was a secondary endpoint2
- At the time of updated analysis, mOS was 12.9 months (95% CI, 11.3-14.7) with IMFINZI + EP vs 10.5 months (95% CI, 9.3-11.2) with EP alone3
*Overall survival was the primary endpoint. At the time of the planned interim overall survival analysis with a median duration of follow-up of 14.2 months, mOS was 13 months (95% CI, 11.5-14.8) with IMFINZI + EP vs 10.3 months (95% CI, 9.3-11.2) with EP alone (HR=0.73; 95% CI, 0.59-0.91; P=0.0047).1,2
†The updated OS analysis was conducted with a median duration of follow-up of 25.1 months. OS rates at 12, 18, and 24 months are the estimated proportion of patients alive based on the updated analysis.3
Months matter in ES-SCLC—Start with IMFINZI + EP for all eligible patients1
UPDATED ANALYSIS: Overall survival demonstrated across patient subgroups with IMFINZI + EP3||
Prespecified subgroup overall survival analysis3
SWIPE FOR MORE
SWIPE FOR MORE


IMFINZI + EP was evaluated in key patient subgroups reflective of clinical practice in ES-SCLC2,4-8
- Patients over 65
- Former and active smokers
- Patients with brain/CNS metastases
- Cisplatin- and carboplatin-eligible patients
ES-SCLC=extensive-stage small cell lung cancer; EP=etoposide and either carboplatin or cisplatin; mOS=median overall survival; HR=hazard ratio; CI=confidence interval; OS=overall survival; ECOG=Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group; WHO=World Health Organization; PS=performance status; CNS=central nervous system; AJCC=American Joint Committee on Cancer.
||OS subgroup analysis was not powered to show a statistically significant difference between or within individual subgroups.2
Progression-Free Survival in ES-SCLC
INTERIM ANALYSIS: At 1 year, 18% of patients were progression free with IMFINZI + EP2
Percentage of patients alive and progression free at 1 year
(median duration of follow-up 14.2 months)2
- Median PFS: 5.1 months (95% CI, 4.7-6.2) with IMFINZI + EP and 5.4 months (95% CI, 4.8-6.2) with EP alone (HR=0.78; 95% CI, 0.65-0.94; 96% of total planned events)1
- PFS was not formally tested for statistical significance at the interim analysis2
- PFS rate at 12 months was a secondary endpoint2
Progression-free survival with IMFINZI + EP and EP alone
(median duration of follow-up 25.1 months)3*


- Median PFS did not change at the updated analysis1,3
- PFS was not formally tested for statistical significance at the updated analysis3
- PFS rate at 12 months was a secondary endpoint2
PFS=progression-free survival.
*PFS rates at 12, 18, and 24 months are the estimated proportion of patients alive and progression free based on the updated analysis.3
Objective Response Rate in ES-SCLC
INTERIM ANALYSIS: IMFINZI + EP provided a high response rate1,2
Confirmed objective response rate in first-line ES-SCLC (post-hoc analysis)1,2


- Complete responses: 2% with IMFINZI + EP and 1% with EP alone2
- Partial responses: 66% with IMFINZI + EP and 57% with EP alone2
Study Design and Patient Characteristics in ES-SCLC
The Phase III CASPIAN study compared IMFINZI + EP against real-world treatment with EP in ES-SCLC2,5
A large, randomized, open-label, multicenter study of IMFINZI + etoposide and platinum-based chemotherapy (EP) vs EP alone1,2


Primary endpoint1,2
Overall survival
Key secondary endpoints1,2
- PFS§
- ORR (unconfirmed)§
- OS at 18 months
- PFS at 6 and 12 months
- HRQoL patient-reported outcomes
CASPIAN allowed for

Investigator’s choice of platinum-based chemotherapy2||

Patients with asymptomatic or treated brain metastases2¶
The control arm allowed for

Up to 6 cycles of EP 57% of patients received 6 cycles1

PCI per investigator’s discretion1
Baseline patient characteristics were well balanced between the IMFINZI + EP and EP arms2
Patient characteristics3
IMFINZI + EP (n=268) |
EP alone (n=269) |
|
---|---|---|
Median age (years) (range) | 62 (28-82) | 62 (35-82) |
Male, % | 70.9 | 68.4 |
Race, % | ||
White | 85.4 | 82.2 |
Asian | 13.4 | 15.6 |
Other | 1.1 | 2.2 |
WHO PS, % | ||
0 | 36.9 | 33.5 |
1 | 63.1 | 66.5 |
Disease stage, % | ||
III | 10.4 | 8.9 |
IV | 89.6 | 91.1 |
Smoking history, % | ||
Current smoker/former smoker | 44.8 | 46.8 |
Former smoker | 47.0 | 47.6 |
Never smoker | 8.2 | 5.6 |
Brain or CNS metastases, % | 10.4 | 10.0 |
Liver metastases, % | 40.3 | 38.7 |
*All patient's were confirmed as having ES-SCLC.
Q3W=once every 3 weeks; Q4W=once every 4 weeks; PCI=prophylactic cranial irradiation; ORR=objective response rate; HRQoL=health-related quality of life; PD-L1=programmed death-ligand 1; AUC=area under the curve; RECIST=Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors; CT=computed tomography; MRI=magnetic resonance imaging.
*IMFINZI 1500 mg + either carboplatin (AUC 5 mg/mL/min or 6 mg/mL/min) or cisplatin (75 mg/m2-80 mg/m2) on Day 1 and etoposide (80 mg/m2-100 mg/m2) intravenously on Days 1, 2, and 3 of each 21-day cycle for 4 cycles, followed by IMFINZI 1500 mg every 4 weeks until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.1,2
†Either carboplatin (AUC 5 mg/mL/min or 6 mg/mL/min) or cisplatin (75 mg/m2-80 mg/m2) on Day 1 and etoposide (80 mg/m2-100 mg/m2) intravenously on Days 1, 2, and 3 of each 21-day cycle for 4 to 6 cycles.1,2
‡8% of patients who were treated with EP alone received PCI post-EP.1,2
§Assessed using investigator assessments according to RECIST v1.1.2
||78% received carboplatin and 25% received cisplatin in the IMFINZI + EP arm; 78% received carboplatin and 25% received cisplatin in the EP alone arm.2
¶Patients with confirmed brain metastases had to be treated and stable off steroids and anticonvulsants for at least 1 month prior to study treatment. Patients with suspected brain metastases at screening should have a CT/MRI of the brain prior to study entry.2
References: 1. IMFINZI SmPC, September 2020. 2. Paz-Ares L, Dvorkin M, Chen Y, et al. Durvalumab plus platinum–etoposide versus platinum–etoposide in first-line treatment of extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (CASPIAN): a randomised, controlled, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2019;394(10212):1929-1939. 3. Paz-Ares LG, Dvorkin M, Chen Y, et al. Durvalumab ± tremelimumab + platinumetoposide in first-line extensive-stage SCLC: Updated results from the phase 3 CASPIAN study. J Clin Oncol. 2020;38(15 suppl). Published online May 25, 2020. 4. Foster NR. Renfro LA. Schi ld SE. et al. Multi trial evaluation of progression-free survival as a surrogate end point for overall survival in first-line extensive stage small·cell lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol. 2015;10{7):1099-1106. 5. Rudin CM, lsmaila N, Hann CL, et al. Treatment of small-cell lung cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology endorsement of the American College of Chest Physicians Guideline. J Clin Oncol 2015;33(34):4106-4111. 6. Wang S, Zimmermann s. Parikh K. Mansfield AS, Adjei AA. Current diagnosis and management of small·cell lung cancer. Mayo Clin Proc. 2019;94(8):1599· 1622. 7. Seute T. Leffers P, Wilmink JT. ten Velde GPM, Twijnstra A Response of asymptomatic brain metastases from small·cell lung cancer to systemic first-line chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24(13):2079·2083. 8. Parsons HM, Harlan LC, Stevens J L, et al. Treatment of small cell lung cancer in academic and community settings: factors associated with receiving standard therapy and survival. Cancer J. 2014;20(2):97-104.